<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Surviving CRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://niiranen.eu/crm/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm</link>
	<description>Working with Microsoft Dynamics CRM, day in day out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:10:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamics CRM 2011 on Windows Server 2012 by CRM 2011 and Windows Server 2012 &#187; Reserved Words</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/dynamics-crm-2011-on-windows-server-2012/#comment-26801</link>
		<dc:creator>CRM 2011 and Windows Server 2012 &#187; Reserved Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2303#comment-26801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by step guide to install Dynamics CRM 2011 on Windows Server 2012, be sure to check out Jukka’s blog post over here [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by step guide to install Dynamics CRM 2011 on Windows Server 2012, be sure to check out Jukka’s blog post over here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ready Or Not, Orion Is Coming by nzregs</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/04/ready-or-not-orion-is-coming/#comment-26680</link>
		<dc:creator>nzregs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2249#comment-26680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Pedro - remember that &quot;Polaris&quot; is the &quot;first cut&quot; of the new UI that we will see in &quot;Orion&quot; and it is somewhat limited right now.   Expect to see a lot more configurability in the Orion release.  Hopefully we will see some beta versions soon so we can start to understand better what is coming!

P.S. why stop at one customisable lead qualification dialog?  I have several departments that all want different options here - a single customisable dialog doesn&#039;t fit the requirements, I need one for each department :p

Microsoft have a couple of options going forward, (1) innovate and release new features once they have &#039;enough&#039; (2) develop new features and release them when they are &#039;finished&#039;.  Option (2) is how the product lifecycle has worked up until Polaris and virtually nothing new got delivered in that period.  Option (2) is also quite difficult as you can never get everyone to agree on how the functionality should be delivered and you also run the risk of &#039;missing the market&#039; by the time you release something. Option (1) means that you get new functionality out and being used and it can drive conversations with the wider community about what future versions should look like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pedro &#8211; remember that &#8220;Polaris&#8221; is the &#8220;first cut&#8221; of the new UI that we will see in &#8220;Orion&#8221; and it is somewhat limited right now.   Expect to see a lot more configurability in the Orion release.  Hopefully we will see some beta versions soon so we can start to understand better what is coming!</p>
<p>P.S. why stop at one customisable lead qualification dialog?  I have several departments that all want different options here &#8211; a single customisable dialog doesn&#8217;t fit the requirements, I need one for each department :p</p>
<p>Microsoft have a couple of options going forward, (1) innovate and release new features once they have &#8216;enough&#8217; (2) develop new features and release them when they are &#8216;finished&#8217;.  Option (2) is how the product lifecycle has worked up until Polaris and virtually nothing new got delivered in that period.  Option (2) is also quite difficult as you can never get everyone to agree on how the functionality should be delivered and you also run the risk of &#8216;missing the market&#8217; by the time you release something. Option (1) means that you get new functionality out and being used and it can drive conversations with the wider community about what future versions should look like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ready Or Not, Orion Is Coming by Pedro Innecco</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/04/ready-or-not-orion-is-coming/#comment-26676</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Innecco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2249#comment-26676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jukka,

Thanks for the comments. Yes, I came to the same conclusion as Gonzalo. We would have to delete the opportunity entity as it is created.

This is of course, far from perfect, and makes me wonder what was MSFT thinking. They MUST stop trying to second guess what they believe would be best for everybody and give developers and cutomisers the choice, so the system can be built around the business requirements.

I would much rather have the ability to customise a lead qualification dialog rather than have all three records created. For example, we could configure the form so to deselect the &#039;create opportunity&#039; checkbox by default, and hide the option to create an opportunity altogether. This would be independent of the GUI (be it &#039;classic&#039; or &#039;metro&#039;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jukka,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments. Yes, I came to the same conclusion as Gonzalo. We would have to delete the opportunity entity as it is created.</p>
<p>This is of course, far from perfect, and makes me wonder what was MSFT thinking. They MUST stop trying to second guess what they believe would be best for everybody and give developers and cutomisers the choice, so the system can be built around the business requirements.</p>
<p>I would much rather have the ability to customise a lead qualification dialog rather than have all three records created. For example, we could configure the form so to deselect the &#8216;create opportunity&#8217; checkbox by default, and hide the option to create an opportunity altogether. This would be independent of the GUI (be it &#8216;classic&#8217; or &#8216;metro&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinkedIn, Dynamics CRM and Social Selling by Rod Stobo</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/linkedin-dynamics-crm-social-selling/#comment-26192</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Stobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2275#comment-26192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jukka. This will come off as self-promotional, but we addressed this challenge in our cafe moba for Microsoft Dynamics tablet app. LinkedIn profiles (or at least a search for LinkedIn profiles in the case of multiple hits on a single name) are dynamically linked to your Dynamics CRM (Online) contacts. Because we enable you to sign into LinkedIn through the app, you would be able to see profile information according to the license you have. 

The app is available in both the Windows Store for Windows 8 and the App Store for iPad, and, if you&#039;re really diligent, you can find us on Pinpoint (Pinpoint hasn&#039;t really caught up to the whole mobile thing...). It is free, and comes out-of-the-box with the LinkedIn integration. We can also connect other social media sources including Twitter, Facebook, and Google +, but these aren&#039;t available in the free edition.

And, if you&#039;re still with me, we also have a Salesforce edition (App Store for iPad only) that also features the LinkedIn integration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jukka. This will come off as self-promotional, but we addressed this challenge in our cafe moba for Microsoft Dynamics tablet app. LinkedIn profiles (or at least a search for LinkedIn profiles in the case of multiple hits on a single name) are dynamically linked to your Dynamics CRM (Online) contacts. Because we enable you to sign into LinkedIn through the app, you would be able to see profile information according to the license you have. </p>
<p>The app is available in both the Windows Store for Windows 8 and the App Store for iPad, and, if you&#8217;re really diligent, you can find us on Pinpoint (Pinpoint hasn&#8217;t really caught up to the whole mobile thing&#8230;). It is free, and comes out-of-the-box with the LinkedIn integration. We can also connect other social media sources including Twitter, Facebook, and Google +, but these aren&#8217;t available in the free edition.</p>
<p>And, if you&#8217;re still with me, we also have a Salesforce edition (App Store for iPad only) that also features the LinkedIn integration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamics CRM 2011 on Windows Server 2012 by CRM 2011 sous Windows Server 2012 &#124; Blog d&#039;Abbas</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/dynamics-crm-2011-on-windows-server-2012/#comment-25914</link>
		<dc:creator>CRM 2011 sous Windows Server 2012 &#124; Blog d&#039;Abbas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2303#comment-25914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Je me suis inspiré du post: http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/dynamics-crm-2011-on-windows-server-2012/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Je me suis inspiré du post: <a href="http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/dynamics-crm-2011-on-windows-server-2012/" rel="nofollow">http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/dynamics-crm-2011-on-windows-server-2012/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamics CRM 2011 on Windows Server 2012 by Juha-Pulkkinen</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/dynamics-crm-2011-on-windows-server-2012/#comment-25489</link>
		<dc:creator>Juha-Pulkkinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 07:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2303#comment-25489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Jukka for wrap up! I might not hit my head to wall with same issues with Windows Server 2012 installation. But still wonder why this is done so hard way altough Windows Server 2012 is now supported.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jukka for wrap up! I might not hit my head to wall with same issues with Windows Server 2012 installation. But still wonder why this is done so hard way altough Windows Server 2012 is now supported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamics Marketplace vs. Microsoft Pinpoint: where are all the CRM apps? by Rod Stobo</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2012/10/dynamics-marketplace-vs-microsoft-pinpoint-where-are-all-the-crm-apps/#comment-25443</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Stobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=1937#comment-25443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jukka, one of the other obstacles we&#039;ve faced is that the Dynamics Marketplace requires 2 reference customers in every country in which you want to list - for ISV&#039;s, this seems like a high hurdle to cross in a global economy, plus sets up a &quot;chicken and egg&quot; scenario - we would like to get those reference accounts, but aren&#039;t allowed Marketplace access to help get them! 

I understand the desire to create and maintain a high quality marketplace, but this seems to impede both partners and customers (who don&#039;t see everything that&#039;s available - as you&#039;ve noted) and actually reduces the growth and value of the marketplace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jukka, one of the other obstacles we&#8217;ve faced is that the Dynamics Marketplace requires 2 reference customers in every country in which you want to list &#8211; for ISV&#8217;s, this seems like a high hurdle to cross in a global economy, plus sets up a &#8220;chicken and egg&#8221; scenario &#8211; we would like to get those reference accounts, but aren&#8217;t allowed Marketplace access to help get them! </p>
<p>I understand the desire to create and maintain a high quality marketplace, but this seems to impede both partners and customers (who don&#8217;t see everything that&#8217;s available &#8211; as you&#8217;ve noted) and actually reduces the growth and value of the marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Next Dynamics CRM User Experience: Orion by Microsoft Convergence 2013 RoundupEnterprise Social Software, Email Management, Chat, &#38; Knowledgebase</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/03/the-next-dynamics-crm-user-experience-orion/#comment-25397</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Convergence 2013 RoundupEnterprise Social Software, Email Management, Chat, &#38; Knowledgebase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 21:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2213#comment-25397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Updates to the UI. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Updates to the UI. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamics CRM 2011 on Windows Server 2012 by Jukka Niiranen</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/dynamics-crm-2011-on-windows-server-2012/#comment-25350</link>
		<dc:creator>Jukka Niiranen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 10:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2303#comment-25350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrea, this sandbox server image contains everything that CRM needs to run, so it&#039;s got a domain controller, IIS web server and SQL Server 2012 all on the same server. I haven&#039;t ever run into any issues with the DC being a local one, but as mentioned, I only use these sandboxes for personal test cases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, this sandbox server image contains everything that CRM needs to run, so it&#8217;s got a domain controller, IIS web server and SQL Server 2012 all on the same server. I haven&#8217;t ever run into any issues with the DC being a local one, but as mentioned, I only use these sandboxes for personal test cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamics CRM 2011 on Windows Server 2012 by Andrea1911</title>
		<link>http://niiranen.eu/crm/2013/05/dynamics-crm-2011-on-windows-server-2012/#comment-25340</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 08:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://niiranen.eu/crm/?p=2303#comment-25340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jukka.

Nice article, thanks for sharing.
May I ask you if you have installed domain controller role ?

thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jukka.</p>
<p>Nice article, thanks for sharing.<br />
May I ask you if you have installed domain controller role ?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
